Jump to content

Talk:stack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by The Editor's Apprentice in topic RFC discussion: December 2020–February 2021

Missing computing sense

[edit]

I hear about things like a "JavaScript stack", meaning something like a toolchain. It definitely isn't the data structure. Any ideas? Equinox 13:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Done Done Now added: the "standard set of software components". Equinox 16:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

The first two computing senses are a calque of stapel#Dutch. See http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd10xx/EWD1000.PDF. --85.148.244.121 06:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Caltech ditch day sense removed

[edit]

See [1]. This was the result of the discussion at Talk:ditch day. Equinox 16:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gaming sense (in computer games, collectible card games, etc.)

[edit]

What about in this sense? "A magical widget will double your mojo. And yes, they do stack: if you manage to get two magical widgets, your mojo will be quadrupled. With three, it will be octupled, and so forth."

Done Done Equinox 09:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

RFC discussion: December 2020–February 2021

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


It is unclear how the computing definitions differ from each other. The related terms also need to be put into templates. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 01:31, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

It was clearer before this edit that was purportedly to "Distingusih computing definitions". As I understand it, the first sense is about the data structure as a concept, the second is about an instance of the first sense that's a part of the system architecture and is used for temporary storage. The third sense is unrelated to the first two. The fourth one is related to the third, but I'm a bit fuzzy on the details (the last programming class I took was in 1983...) Chuck Entz (talk) 03:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@The Editor's Apprentice Is it better now? — surjection??17:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Very much so! Thank you Surjection, it is now clear to me that each of the definitions are distinct. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply