Talk:spierversterken

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 9 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: March–October 2015
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: March–October 2015

[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


This word is not a single word unlike spierversterking which is. Where is the source? --DrJos (talk) 22:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

google books:"spierversterken". Yup. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Move to rfv though as both the noun and the verb need attesting. Renard Migrant (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Per the above, this is attested. So, passed. (Some citations in the entry may not be durable but more Google books hits, including for e.g. the form spierversterkend which CodeCat mentions, exist.) - -sche (discuss) 17:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply