Jump to content

Talk:sophistry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Al-Muqanna in topic RFV discussion: September–December 2022

Part of what makes sophistry unique from other fallacious forms of argument is the act of over-complication. Making a simple matter seem more complex than it really is, then using the unnecessary complexity to change the matter in the eyes of the beholder, is sophistry. No definition of sophistry can be complete without mentioning over-complication. — This unsigned comment was added by 206.13.113.5 (talk) at 17:01, 8 November 2005.

RFV discussion: September–December 2022

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense: Cunning, sometimes manifested as trickery.

In the entry since 2007. This is fairly generic. The other senses are the uncountable sophistic reasoning and the countable instance of sophistic reasoning, and these are in dictionaries. Both of these are cases of use of cunning, but that does not establish a generic sense of cunning. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed. The sense was already removed by another user a week back, and this has been open for a while and the decision seems sensible. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 14:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply