Talk:snow train

RfD discussion

Not idiomatic, sum of parts, not a set phrase, etc. --Connel MacKenzie 21:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

• I've changed the definition. Is that any better? SemperBlotto 22:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

SB - I think I was trying to edit at the same time as yourself. Both the old and new defs are accurate, the term is a set phrase for a specific service. The first few cites I found all were capitalised though.??--Dmol 22:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. This is so not sum-of-parts I don't even know which test to call it under. Does the train go through snow? Is it made of snow? Does it carry snow? Having seen at most about 2.54 centimeters of snow in my life, I didn't have a clue what a snow train was until I read the definition... to the last word. DAVilla 10:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
  • OK then, removing rfd tag. I disagree, but don't care enough about it. --Connel MacKenzie 19:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)