Talk:smoker's cough

Deletion debate

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

smoker's cough

SoP. The cough is evidently from a smoker already. TeleComNasSprVen 07:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

• Keep. Not every cough from a smoker is smoker's cough. It's a specific thing. Ƿidsiþ 07:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
  • keep since a person does not necessarily need to smoke to get a smoker's cough. -- Prince Kassad 09:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. It is used as if to describe a medical condition or symptom. DCDuring TALK 11:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Keep, same reasons. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Keep, I concur. ---> Tooironic 13:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

• Keep per previous commenters. I've added a cite that I think highlights Widsith's point. —Ruakh_TALK 21:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

If Prince Kassad or DCDuring is right (and I don't doubt it), then we need a better definition than the current "The cough someone gets as a result of habitual smoking"!​—msh210℠ (talk) 18:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Added "persistent" to the definition. --Hekaheka 11:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Kept. DAVilla 11:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)