Jump to content

Talk:smöken

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Leasnam

@leasnam Modern vocalism as I know it always has the vowel from PGM *au and a Google search doesn't produce results which point to *smuk-. This word might be a backformation from the noun or go back to some *smaukan, but I'm not really knowledgeable about PGM or Old Saxon. How do you suppose we deal with this? Korn [kʰũːɘ̃n] (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

@korn, the Old Saxon attestation would provide the answer, yet unfortunately it's absent. And the alternatives you mention above are probably more likely. We can either remove the proto-germanic entirely from the etymology, or add all to it. Leasnam (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
For grins, I added both verbs to see how ugly it might appear...it doesn't look too bad imo. (Didn't mention the noun yet though) Leasnam (talk) 14:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
On final thought I think you're right. I removed *smukōn, and replaced it with *smōkian. Your thoughts ? Leasnam (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Well, it's an educated guess matching the best of our knowledge of modern developments without any contradicting data and reaffirmed by cognates. Until someone comes with proper citations of the opposite, I think it's best Wiktionary practice to keep it as it is. Köbler points to the noun, rather than to an OSX etymon, for both "smôken" (intransitive) and "smö̂ken" (transitive). I added some caveat phrasings, feel free to smoothen it. Korn [kʰũːɘ̃n] (talk) 15:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Looks good. Thanks ! Leasnam (talk) 02:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply