Talk:silver jubilee
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Mglovesfun in topic silver jubilee
Deletion debate
[edit]The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
(deprecated template usage) silver + (deprecated template usage) jubilee. We should have the table of these things according to the customs in various cultures. DCDuring TALK 17:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- See Appendix:Anniversary associations, ripped from WP. DCDuring TALK 17:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- We lack the sense of silver, though I agree we shouldn't. If the definitions we have are right — which I doubt — that jubilee is a generic anniversary whereas silver jubilee is especially a monarch's, then keep. Otherwise, delete as SOP.—msh210℠ 18:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- An appendix sounds like a great idea to me, although this isn't exactly bowling me over as unidiomatic. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep: it is only by providing the meaning of "silver jubilee" at "silver" that this becomes a sum of parts. Or does "silver" in this sense combine with anything else but "jubilee"? Also for those who care: “silver jubilee”, in OneLook Dictionary Search.. --Dan Polansky 17:34, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Silver combines with anniversary.—msh210℠ 04:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep.see also in Wikipedia. Peleg 17:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Silver combines with jubilee, anniversary, wedding, feast, etc. —Michael Z. 2010-03-15 18:25 z
- Agree, then. But in that case, we should give silver another definition there. Peleg 20:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Silver combines with jubilee, anniversary, wedding, feast, etc. —Michael Z. 2010-03-15 18:25 z
- Done.[1] Note that silver wedding (not a wedding) and silver-feast (not just a feast) are idiomatic, while silver jubilee and silver anniversary, etc are sum-of-parts. These all come to English from the German silberhochzeit, silberne hochzeit. —Michael Z. 2010-03-25 20:43 z
Kept for no consensus. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)