Jump to content

Talk:scrouge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Equinox in topic skrouge

Request for verification

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Sense 1: example sentence isn't actually using the word. Sense 2: er, Scrooge? Equinox 23:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The first sense is in several dictionaries, including the OED, often marked as now a US regionalism. I would also guess that it should be marked dated, if not obsolete. I get that cited soon when I have some time.

"Scrouge" also seems to be a semi-common alternative spelling for the Dickens character, and several sources also state that the first sense was where Dickens got the name "Scrooge" from.[1][2] I am not sure if we will be able to find citations for that spelling being used in the way it is defined here, though. Dominic·t 09:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Scrunch is more common in the UK (I don't think we would understand scrouge, though it seems to have been common in the past). There are lots of similar words like scrinch, scringe etc. The example is not of the heading word. Dbfirs 10:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Seems like both sense are for other words, so it looks to me like we'll be deleting both of those anyway, Mglovesfun (talk) 11:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Fails. Mglovesfun (talk) 06:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


skrouge

[edit]

John Camden Hotten's Slang Dictionary (1873) has this spelling, though in practice it seems very rare. Equinox 00:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply