Talk:restructurar
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 years ago by AG202 in topic RFD discussion: July–September 2022
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Spanish: All forms of restructurar can be deleted, because it is a misspelling Dunderdool (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is a common misspelling. --Lambiam 13:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. We retain entries for common misspellings like this one. Glades12 (talk) 10:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Strong keep. AG202 (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Strong keep. I even found an argument that it isn't a misspelling at all, which actually makes sense to me. Other than restructurar being historically proscribed, I don't see what makes this situation inherently different from antiimperialista and antimperialista, or contraataque and contrataque. Binarystep (talk) 05:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
RFD-kept. I'll also change it to be defined as an alternative form. AG202 (talk) 16:08, 4 September 2022 (UTC)