Talk:repræſentation
Add topicLatest comment: 13 years ago by -sche in topic repræſentation
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
As per diſtinguiſh which failed RFD, as the software can now auto-redirect long-s spellings to round s. -- Liliana • 15:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's only a typographic difference. Suppose that we can create pages in different fonts, different character sizes, etc. It would not be a reason to create them. Only the spelling is important. Lmaltier 19:14, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- I too favor deletion. --Mglovesfun (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, because the software can now auto-redirect ſ to s. - -sche (discuss) 02:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- I too favor deletion. --Mglovesfun (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
The definition is wrong, too: this is not an obsolete spelling, but an obsolete typography. Exactly like texts using a single character for st. Lmaltier 05:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Vote to delete (as this is typographical, not a different spelling). --6th Happiness 02:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Deleted. By the way, "EU" was given as an anagram of "uſe"... seems the bot can't handle long S. - -sche (discuss) 05:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)