Talk:regime change
Add topic
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: "A war promoting such a change." which refers to sense #1. I don't see how the war/offensive itself can be called a regime change. I suspect it's just plain wrong, but I don't mind it sitting here for 30 days. Mglovesfun (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- RFV failed. Deleted.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Deletion discussion
[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
As above. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as currently defined, although an RfV may be in order. If The phrase is limited to change accomplished by external military force, then the phrase is not SoP. bd2412 T 16:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Regime change seems to mean change of regime by an external force, not by a coup or by an election. So I'm with BD2412 on this, keep as currently defined. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Kept. No consensus.--Jusjih (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)