Talk:randominity

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

randominity

Just an error, existence of entry is quite unhelpful and misleading. --Connel MacKenzie 03:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I found a citation, so I recreated this entry. However, I sent it immediately to RFV. † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 18:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

randominity

Previously deleted, but finding a citation encouraged me to reädd it. Sent to RFV as I only saw one citation (not that I looked very far). † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 18:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Finished. DAVilla 18:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Since all but one of the quotations is from Usenet, do the quotations count as "durably archived"? The usual term in literature is randomness. --EncycloPetey 17:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

RFV passed. Thanks, DAVilla. —Ruakh_TALK 19:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)