Talk:quomodo stas

@Metaknowledge: this looks like a calque of modern Romance equivalents; I don't buy it, and in any case it's not classical. What do you think? --Barytonesis (talk) 14:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

I see cites for it, so it stays. But the initial context label should never have been removed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 20:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

@Metaknowledge@Barytonesis I added a quote from the XIV century. We must not limit our dictionary only to what is Classical.—Aearthrise ^{(Ⲁⲉⲁⲣⲑⲣⲓⲥⲉ)} 13:53, 5 December 2017‎(UTC)