Talk:quism

RFV — passed

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

This word doesn't seem like it could be a real word. The definition is a bit sketchy, and the Google Books search turned up results, but none would be satisfactory enough to cite for this word. Therefore, I would like to request some additional verification for this entry. Thanks, Razorflame 07:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Looks citable to me, but barely: [1] Remember we only need three. Equinox 14:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

And now we have three. Cited. Equinox 18:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Nope, just two. (The 1990 cite, being a mention, doesn't count.) —Ruakh_TALK 19:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

There are hundreds of uses on Google Scholar; cited again by adding one. :-) -- Visviva 16:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Striking. Note that somebody seems to have put the neologism template on it. Equinox ◑ 13:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)