Talk:qəpik
Latest comment: 9 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: August 2014–March 2015
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
I'm sure there should be an Azeri sense with this spelling, but I am wildly skeptical of the idea that this could be an English spelling of the word.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Alt forms are worth a look too. Apparently I created qepiq but I'm not finding much for that either. Equinox ◑ 13:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- The English spelling is qapik or gapik (phonetic rendering), ultimately from Russian копе́йка (kopéjka). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- qəpik = RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 02:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. I could only find one use, and one mention. Issuu had a third citation, but I wasn't convinced it was durably archived; it looked like just a glorified Googledoc. - -sche (discuss) 01:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. Per Anatoli, this one may be attested, but qapiks doesn't get any Google Books hits (in any language). - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Cited. So far, it's looking like this should be the lemma. - -sche (discuss) 01:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. Per Anatoli, this one may be attested; gapiks does get one relevant Google Books hit. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 02:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just barely cited. - -sche (discuss) 02:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 02:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)