Talk:qəpik

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 9 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: August 2014–March 2015
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: August 2014–March 2015

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


I'm sure there should be an Azeri sense with this spelling, but I am wildly skeptical of the idea that this could be an English spelling of the word.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Alt forms are worth a look too. Apparently I created qepiq but I'm not finding much for that either. Equinox 13:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
The English spelling is qapik or gapik (phonetic rendering), ultimately from Russian копе́йка (kopéjka). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
qəpik = RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 02:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Cited. - -sche (discuss) 00:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failed. I could only find one use, and one mention. Issuu had a third citation, but I wasn't convinced it was durably archived; it looked like just a glorified Googledoc. - -sche (discuss) 01:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. Per Anatoli, this one may be attested, but qapiks doesn't get any Google Books hits (in any language). - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Cited. So far, it's looking like this should be the lemma. - -sche (discuss) 01:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. Per Anatoli, this one may be attested; gapiks does get one relevant Google Books hit. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Cited. - -sche (discuss) 01:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Cited. - -sche (discuss) 01:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 02:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Just barely cited. - -sche (discuss) 02:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Explicitly adding the alt forms to the RFV. - -sche (discuss) 21:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 02:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply