Talk:president-elect
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: January–March 2019
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Isn't this just [[president]] + [[-elect]]? One can also speak of a "senator-elect", "chairman-elect", "attorney general-elect", etc. - -sche (discuss) 06:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it is just that, but should we consider this two words, or is it one word? (Also, by the way, isn‘t attorney general “just” [[attorney]] + [[general]], sense #2)? --Lambiam 09:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WT:LEMMING (“president-elect”, in OneLook Dictionary Search.), although the lemming support looks more uncertain than before: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2018-12/Lemming principle into CFI. Apart from lemming, why should the reader look at -elect and not elect, and how should they know? “-elect”, in OneLook Dictionary Search.. I think president-elect is a very convenient entry for someone looking for the meaning; if not for WT:LEMMING, I would at least suggest a redirection. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep president-elect, a reference added. President-elect is apparently used as a title; I suppose it can be kept but modified slightly. DonnanZ (talk) 10:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Abstain. I'm not bothered by this one. Per utramque cavernam 20:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep.
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 10:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC) - Keep. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- RFD passed. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 00:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)