Talk:phantasy
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Equinox in topic Psychology sense
RFV
[edit]The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
¶ Is this actually archaic or rare? There are ∼100 Google books past the 1970s which feature this form. Although it is an older and less common spelling, I think those tags are erroneous. --Pilcrow 13:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Why is this here? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- I suppose that Pilcrow (talk • contribs) is making a "request for verification" of the correctness of the "(rare, archaic)" sense-tag. —RuakhTALK 23:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- ¶ So should I remove this request? --Pilcrow 19:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I think so. Maybe ask in the tea room? This page is really more for verifying whether a given word or sense exists. —RuakhTALK 20:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hence the WT:RFM request filed by CodeCat to change the name of this page to Requests to attestation. That request has died a bit. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- ¶ So should I remove this request? --Pilcrow 19:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- I suppose that Pilcrow (talk • contribs) is making a "request for verification" of the correctness of the "(rare, archaic)" sense-tag. —RuakhTALK 23:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Closing. --Pilcrow 22:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Psychology sense
[edit]This word is also used in (Kleinian?) psychology. Wikipedia has something on it. Equinox ◑ 12:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done Added by Smurrayinchester. Thanks. Equinox ◑ 13:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)