Talk:peeps
Slang or colloquial?
[edit]Regarding the content I just added: should it be "slang" or "colloquial"?
Update: I think I messed up. It was already mentioned under "Etymology 2". But shouldn't there be a mention of slang or colloquial? The Wikipedia disambiguation page for peeps list it as:
Slang for people.
--Mortense 14:23, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I would say that it is slang rather than colloquial. —Stephen 18:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: (19th century) People. Since this is the same as the first sense this is just asking for verification that it was used in the 19th century. DTLHS (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'd just merge the defns. Yeah, we might be able to find proof it was popular in the 19th century, and then the term went into disuse and was revivified again. --XY3999 (talk) 09:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedied, as it's incorrect to have a separate "sense" which is identical to the main sense just because the word can be antedated. If quotations from the 19th century or earlier can be found,
{{defdate}}can be updated. — SGconlaw (talk) 04:15, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Speedied, as it's incorrect to have a separate "sense" which is identical to the main sense just because the word can be antedated. If quotations from the 19th century or earlier can be found,