Talk:pedopathy

So we have two mentions of pedopathy, any uses? Mglovesfun (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Well, the 1990 quot. is a use, even if it's only a section title. The 2004 quot. is a mention, I suppose, but it's slightly more use-y than just a dictionary headword. It's interesting to note that neither (deprecated template usage) pedopathy nor pædopathy share any meaning with pedopath. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 11:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

First one probably is a use and used elsewhere in the same book, just we can't access it. Mglovesfun (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, you're probably right. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)