Talk:parallelled
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic RFD discussion
RFD discussion
[edit]The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
See discussion at parallel. Hypercorrection to Commonwealth past tense from U.S. spelling. Paul Brians’ Common Errors in English Usage webpage appears to have listed it as a British variant in the past, but he, too, has excised it. —Wiki Wikardo 04:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Disapproval is not a reason to delete words in use. This is not a simple misspelling; Google Books shows many hits, many from scholarly works. Corrections to definitions is a job for WT:TR, not RFD.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, why would anyone want to delete a standard UK spelling? It appears six times in the OED (though only in citations). Dbfirs 09:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep as no deletion rationale is given. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Strong keep: real and trivially attestable. Equinox ◑ 01:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)