Talk:oversit
Add topicPlease re-check 1873 citation
[edit]I would bet good money that it's just a scanno for "over it". Equinox ◑ 15:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- You are correct. DTLHS (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Equinox Can you verify the other citation? DTLHS (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- No. The text is here [1] but it's absolutely packed with scannos. I tried searching for bits and pieces but couldn't find the right sentence. Equinox ◑ 16:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Rfv-sense: "governance, authority, possession, control". One citation removed that was actually "over it". I suspect the remaining one is actually "oversight", but I cannot find the quote on Google books or archive.org. The OED has no noun sense for this word. DTLHS (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- The date on the remaining cite is probably wrong by 3-400 years. Feveryere was apparently an old form of February as well as a surname. Anglo-Norman? DCDuring TALK 02:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't actually view the citation as it's a no preview book, but it's probably just a very old fashioned name but the rest of the spelling looks modern. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- I mean, all three versions of it on Google Books, they're all no preview. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- I found a version I could see, and the spelling is clearly old on several other words as well. I would say this is just an example of oversight with the non-standardised spelling of the day. Kiwima (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- I mean, all three versions of it on Google Books, they're all no preview. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't actually view the citation as it's a no preview book, but it's probably just a very old fashioned name but the rest of the spelling looks modern. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Slang, humorous: "To misunderstand." UNDER + STAND, OVER + SIT, get it? Example given: "Nobody understands me; they all oversit me." (Some of the other senses and citations look very dodgy too, but I'll leave them for now.) Equinox ◑ 15:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- RFV failed - feel free to RFV any other senses, they do look dodgy Thyself be knowne (talk) 13:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)