Talk:oil pipeline
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by Donnanz in topic RFD discussion: February 2019
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
SOP. 68.193.47.68 19:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's certainly SoP, but are we keeping translation hubs these days? SemperBlotto (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Would those get flagged in some way? -Mike (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WT:THUB: I don't think Czech ropovod is "a closed compound that is a word-for-word translation of the English term"; especially, "-vod" is not obvious from "pipeline". A similar argument holds for Polish ropociąg, I think. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I notice that in Bokmål that the expected compound of olje + rørledning is usually contracted to oljeledning. The same happens in Danish and Nynorsk. DonnanZ (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- Strangely, there is no entry for oil pipe or oilpipe (for lubricating oil). They must exist, surely. DonnanZ (talk) 12:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)