Talk:novum

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Rfv-sense: "The feature of a fictional work's setting, especially in science fiction, that distinguishes it from the real world."

In general this just means "A new feature". I don't doubt that this word is used in the context of sci-fi literary criticism. I am just not sure that the def. above really defines is properly. DCDuring TALK 19:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

The first hit at google books:"novum" SF has this to say:

It seems that this ‘point of difference’, the thing or things that differentiate the world portrayed in science fiction from the world we recognise around us, is the crucial separator between SF and other forms of imaginative or fantastic literature. The critic Darko Suvin has usefully coined the term ‘novum’, the Latin for ‘new’ or ‘new thing’, to refer to this ‘point of difference’ (the plural is ‘nova’). An SF text may be based on one novum, such as […] . More usually it will be predicated on a number of interrelated nova, such as […] . This ‘novum’ must not be supernatural but need not necessarily be a piece of technology.

link

So our definition actually seems pretty good to me. I think the big problem will be demonstrating independence: the b.g.c. search I just linked to says it finds tens of thousands of hits, but a large proportion of them likely mention Suvin. Unfortunately, as I've mentioned elsewhere on this page, we don't have a clear definition of "independence".

—Ruakh_TALK 22:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

If a single author (Suvin) is mentioned in tens of thousands of books, is his work "well-known"? - -sche 21:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Could we make Suvin's definition a usage note or move it to the reference section? - -sche (discuss) 04:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

RFV-failed, but I added the quotation Ruakh found to the Quotations section, so that the sense is still present. - -sche (discuss) 03:38, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Feel free to re-add the sense with citations. - -sche (discuss) 17:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)