Talk:nichtinstrumental
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Liliana-60 in topic nichtinstrumental
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Please delete this entry, that Word doesn't exist in the German vocabulary! Thanks --Bigbossfarin (talk) 11:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- You probably meant this to go to RfV. Anyway, it is certainly rare, but there are half a dozen hits on Google book search - so it would probably pass. Keep SemperBlotto (talk) 11:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep though there are very few examples on Boogle Gooks that aren't scannos for "nicht instrumental" as two words or else false divisions of longer words like "nichtinstrumentalistisch" or "Nichtinstrumentalisierungsansatz". —Angr 12:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Valid citations do seem to be available, so keep, or move to RFV if there is doubt about whether valid citations actually are available or not. - -sche (discuss) 00:11, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, keep. (But where are all the people who want to delete compound German nouns? Why do adjectives not get the same treatment?)—msh210℠ (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, if we deleted these, we would have to delete all the similar English words beginning with "non". SemperBlotto (talk) 08:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
kept -- Liliana • 17:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)