Talk:ngo5

RFD

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

ngo5

Cantonese pinyin, a single entry. See also Wiktionary:Requests_for_deletion/Others#Category:Cantonese_Pinyin_syllables. --Anatoli ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

• Keep in the absence of a rationale for deletion. For other similar entries, seee Category:Cantonese jyutping. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
• delete Unlike Pinyin, this is not used by native population, so we should delete it unless proof to the contrary is presented. -- Liliana • 08:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Unlike Mandarin Pinyin? This entry states that it is Cantonese pinyin (which is a bit non-standard as you have stated). Bumm13 (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

• Keep Just for clarification, Cantonese Pinyin is not the same as Jyutping, which is the de facto standard for Cantonese romanization in Hong Kong. Specifically, keep as the ngo5 reading is the same in Jyutping as it is in the much-less-used Cantonese Pinyin romanization system. Bumm13 (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
• Keep but only once converted to a jyutping entry, which is what Dan and Bumm13 seem to support as well, given their comments. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 03:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Kept, per consensus here and because this discussion was largely superseded by the vote on allowing Jyutping. - -sche (discuss) 09:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Striken out. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)