Talk:miniaturism
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Verification of the sense of ‘hobby of collecting, creating and/or displaying scale miniature items’ is needed. I'm not quite sure which sense the quotation I supplied pertains to, by the way. — Beobach972 17:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is the hobby of the miniaturist2 as expressed by the -ist/-ism relationship. — Joe Webster 19:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- But is it in use? — Beobach972 20:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Isn't -ism automatically implied by -ist? — Joe Webster 23:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not unless you want to claim that the existence of artist, typist, flautist/flutist, and heck, mist and fist automatically makes artism, typism, flautism/flutism, mism, and fism words. (Some of them do actually have enough b.g.c. cites to pass RFV, but are you really claiming that the mere existence of their -ist counterparts would mean we should include them?) —RuakhTALK 00:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
"Fist" and "mist" do not contain the morpheme -ist. The examples given above seem to be the exceptions rather than the rule. For the adherent/adherence relationship, such as hedonist/hedonism, atheist/atheism, creationist/creationism, etc., they seem pretty inseparable. — Joe Webster 07:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Also, -ed and -ing are included when a verb gets accepted, whether used or not. — Joe Webster 22:48, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- rfvfailed Cynewulf 21:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)