Talk:liator
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Mr. Granger in topic liator
I think that the term "hoax" was a bit inaccurate.
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Legal advisor. Not in my dictionaries, but this isn't my area of expertise. Ƿidsiþ 09:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- There's nothing that supports this in the OED and no hinting potential Latinate etymon in Lewis & Short. I checked dozens of b.g.c. hits for the singular and the plural forms, but all I could find were scannos except for a handful of uses of the surname Liator, an entry for which I have just created. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 17:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- I found this usage in the Star Trek universe (!): [1]. Perhaps a Trekkie added it? Equinox ◑ 21:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- That site, as well as the episode's script, suggests that Liator is the character's name, and therefore a proper noun, not a common noun. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 21:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Liator is already created, capitalized. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I created it; however, it's listed as a surname, and not as a given name or as a common noun. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 21:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- I initially speedy deleted this as a hoax and, it's still looking like a hoax. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 16:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)