Talk:lõvi

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Coywjs in topic problematic template of the type 17/elu
Jump to navigation Jump to search

problematic template of the type 17/elu

[edit]

Not all the nouns of type 17 have a short form in illative case. However, the current template of the type 17/elu take the short form as granted and generate a nonexistent short form, such as lõvi > *lõvvi/lõvisse. It would be better to add an extra parameter into the template, manually indicating whether a specific word has a short form. One step further, phonologic restrictions (b d g h j k l m n p r s t) could be applied to automatically determine whether a short form is available. Kaʋel (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Coywjs: Template issues might get more attention at WT:GP. Equinox 22:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your guidance~ I ll try it there Kaʋel (talk) 13:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply