Talk:kriki

kriki

This is another sort of iffy one. It's a language with a population of 40, second language only. It does have an ISO [1]. Should I keep bringing these weird languages here? Is there a better place for stuff like this, or should I just leave these things alone? Cerealkiller13 20:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

You tick off the one guy who's entering these, and what are the chances that one of the other 39 would have even heard of Wiktionary, let alone want to contribute? DAVilla 17:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

It may be a rare language, but if it's "real", has an ISO code an someone's willing to enter them, I say let them. --EncycloPetey 02:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, I'll leave them be. Cerealkiller13 17:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Just adding my two cents although the discussion seems to be settled already. Even though languages of this type are/were only used by a very small number of people, I think it is worthy of inclusion for future historical research. Wiktionary will eventually become a major archive of language developement and for this reason we should (within reason) take whatever is out there.--Dmol 16:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Retained per apparent consensus here. —Ruakh_TALK 05:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)