Talk:klismaphile
RFV discussion 1
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
43 Google hits and 0 Google Book hits. † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 03:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- rfvfailed Cynewulf 07:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
RFV discussion 2
[edit]
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Cited by Equinox (talk • contribs). (It looks good to me, but it previously failed RFV and was deleted, so I figured I should mention it here and make sure no one objects to the cites.) —RuakhTALK 02:23, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- It looks like it passes; there look to be a few dozen more examples than were added. Tag as uncommon? — Beobach 18:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Detagged; striking. If someone did so object, he could nominate it; if someone does so object, he can remove my strikeout tags.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
This and Amerikkka, which had only the smallest handful of Google hits when checked a few years ago, now pass with two dozen Books hits... indication, perhaps, of how many books Google adds each year. — Beobach 18:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)