Talk:katagelasticist
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 years ago by This, that and the other in topic RFV discussion: February–March 2022
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Compare the RFV-failed katagelasticism. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 09:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Cited. @Fytcha can you please restore katagelasticism? Plenty of cites have appeared since it failed RFV, so I will cite it when restored. This, that and the other (talk) 03:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- @This, that and the other: Done. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 08:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- Is there evidence supporting the assertion of coinage in the etymology section of katagelasticism? DCDuring (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- The linked Ruch and Proyer paper, at endnote 1, thanks Hempelmann and Harrigan for their assistance in coining the term. Originally our entry said the word was coined by H and H, but credit lies primarily with the paper's authors (after all, they didn't thank H and H for coining the term, only for their assistance in doing so). This, that and the other (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- Is there evidence supporting the assertion of coinage in the etymology section of katagelasticism? DCDuring (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- @This, that and the other: Done. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 08:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
RFV-passed This, that and the other (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2022 (UTC)