Talk:infotactic
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion
[edit]
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Equinox ◑ 20:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- This term appeared in the Nature article that introduced the concept. "Appearance in a refereed academic journal" supersedes all other attestation requirements, so we can basically close this RFV right now. :-P —RuakhTALK 02:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC) P.S. Now cited. —RuakhTALK 22:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Not quite. Unless someone writes an entry on infotaxis, "infotactic" is useless. --Hekaheka 07:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Useless, but valid. Mglovesfun (talk) 08:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- We still use that rule?? DAVilla 13:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Dunno about "we", but I do. It's in WT:CFI. —RuakhTALK 18:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Not quite. Unless someone writes an entry on infotaxis, "infotactic" is useless. --Hekaheka 07:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
RFV passed. —RuakhTALK 18:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)