Jump to content

Talk:inched

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ruakh

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense X 2:

  1. Divided into inches.

#Having the length of a certain number of inches

Gradable? predicate? in both senses? DCDuring Holiday Greetings! 00:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
The second one is okay if we permit compounds. See [1] (four-inched bridge, claws, heel, mesh). Equinox 00:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
As I see it, we don't need an adjective entry if the word is neither gradable (or comparative) nor can serve as a predicate. Is serving in a compound yet another marker of a word being an adjective as opposed to being a past participle? Are there other markers? Are all past participles automatically adjectives? DCDuring Holiday Greetings! 01:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm pretty sure sense #2 isn't a past participle; I'm not familiar with it (I'd just say "four-inch" etc.), but I assume it's analogous to the "eyed" of "blue-eyed", the "legged" of "three-legged", and so on, where the "-ed" means basically "having". (See sense 3 at -ed.) —RuakhTALK 03:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
For the record, 'four-inched bridges' appears in King Lear, with reference to riding horses over them (and feeling proud of the feat). The image is reprised in Harriet & Sophia Lee's (not Chaucer's) "Canterbury Tales" (1857) as 'a four-inched bridge'. Pingku 13:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Let me withdraw the second rfv-sense. I'm still skeptical about the first sense. DCDuring Holiday Greetings! 04:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

First sense RFV failed, removed. —RuakhTALK 02:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply