Talk:illuceo
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by Vladbadu in topic Why no perfect?
Why no perfect?
[edit]The header of the conjugation table states that it has no perfect, while the references themselves mention “illuxit”, among others. I don’t know whether it has a perfect active indicative in Classical Latin, but it is attested, at the very least, in Late Latin (e.g. Ps. 117:27, “ Deus Dominus, et illuxit nobis”).
Does the Latin Wiktionary have a policy against non-Classical forms or is it just an oversight that I should correct? Vladbadu (talk) 18:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)