Talk:ignotum per æqum ignotum
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Eroica in topic RFC discussion: March–April 2011
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
"per æqum|aequum|equum ignotum" is not to be found at bgc. DCDuring TALK 16:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Actually all the Google hits are Wiktionary, Delete. --Mglovesfun (talk) 19:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Try Googling ignotum per aeque ignotum (Eroica 14:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC))
Wonderfool Latin entries. They seem to be worded like English entries; are these in fact Latin phrases used in English? If they are Latin (which I don't really doubt) are they sum of parts, so that only the English should remain? --Mglovesfun (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- A bgc serach for "ignotum+per+æqum|aequum|equum+ignotum" yields abundant cites of logic (or rhetoric?) sense. (Are all fallacies presumptively part of "informal logic"?). DCDuring TALK 16:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- I assume the hits are in English, presumably a Latin phrase borrowed into English, unless the 1989 OED also does Latin definitions. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)