Talk:hell no
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 8 years ago by BD2412 in topic RFD discussion: November–December 2015
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
hell yeah and hell yes were deleted https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:hell_yes. These should be deleted to. 2602:306:3653:8920:C98:897E:434B:84FC 02:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep hell no. I don't think hell yes should have been deleted. I tried to replace "hell" with other expletives in Google Ngram Viewer, and "hell" seems to be the most characteristic. The other ones, heck no and hecks no, are much rarer and thus have much less of a set phrase or phrasebook entry status. Here is my Ngram search: hell no,heck no,hecks no,fuck no,dammit no,damn no,shit no,crap no at the Google Books Ngram Viewer.. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep hell no -- I actually think it expresses something more than simply "firm disagreement". "Hell no, we won't go!!" is a common refrain by people objecting to governmental elements insisting on them having to go somewhere. Might even have one on "oh hell no." Pandeist (talk) 04:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep all. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept as to hell no; no consensus as to heck no and hecks no. bd2412 T 02:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)