Jump to content

Talk:hazhóóʼógo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Eirikr in topic Variant?

Variant?

[edit]

This looks like just a variant of hazhóʼógo. Is this just a spelling variant, or does it represent a dialectical difference? -- Eiríkr ÚtlendiTala við mig 05:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Not a different dialect or just a difference in spelling. I think it has a slightly different meaning from hazhóʼógo. The base word for both forms is hazhóʼó. —Stephen (Talk) 20:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Given that both hazhóʼógo and hazhóóʼógo list slowly as a meaning, is this a bit like saying sloooowly in English -- i.e. emphasizing the slowness by drawing out the vowel? If not, any idea what the derivation is, and where that extra "ó" is coming from? -- Eiríkr ÚtlendiTala við mig 22:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is kind of like that. The extra -ó is not another suffix, it’s just reduplication, drawing the pronunciation out for emphasis. But sloooowly lacks something that hazhóóʼógo has, and sloooowly would not be listed in a dictionary, while hazhóóʼógo is standard enough that it deserves a listing. —Stephen (Talk) 07:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Cool, thank you, that makes sense.
Any ideas on the etyl for the base term hazhóʼó? It looks like ha- (abstract subject marker) + -zhóʼ as some other mode form of -zhǫ́ (imperfective verb stem) + as I know not what; or maybe it's -zhó + -ʼó? -- Eiríkr ÚtlendiTala við mig 21:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think that’s where the Analytical Lexicon of Navajo would come in handy. I assume it would be explained in that. I don’t think that -zhó is the verb stem, I think -ʼó is the stem. -zhó with another stem gives a different meaning: yilzhólí (it is soft and fluffy, downy); hoolzhólí (the place is soft, padded). —Stephen (Talk) 00:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Excellent suggestion, thank you. I'll see about tracking a copy down that doesn't break the bank.  :)
Interesting about -zhó; I would have assumed that those two examples were -zhól + ? -- Cheers, Eiríkr ÚtlendiTala við mig 01:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply