Talk:halfalogue

Once the paper gets published I'll update the source reference. That will make it appear "in a refereed academic journal", and clear the RFV tag. WikiWilliamP 15:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Please let someone more familiar with our procedures clear the tag. DCDuring TALK 16:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say I'd clear the tag, I just said I'll update the reference. That should resolve the RFV and clear the tag.— This unsigned comment was added by WikiWilliamP (talk • contribs).

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Only in one news article so far. Protologism, I think. Equinox ◑ 16:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

But, requoted in many blogs about it. People are catching on to the word "halfalogue" quite easily. WikiWilliamP 12:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

This isn't a debate, we're looking for reliable evidence of use. It gets a month, and if it fails and is deleted, it can be reentered at any time provided it is cited per WT:CFI. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The coining article hasn't been published yet. Any coverage wouldn't seem to be "independent", as I understand the term as used in WT:CFI. There would seem to be no chance that the word would be includable before May 19, 2011, based on our "spanning one year" clause. DCDuring TALK 14:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, entry moved redirectlessly to Citations:halfalogue. —Ruakh_TALK 19:57, 16 September 2010 (UTC)