Jump to content

Talk:godwink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic RFV

RFV

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Protologism? Used by a single author? SemperBlotto (talk) 07:23, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

You may not be aware of WT:CFI#Attestation. A simple Google search means nothing, you can get hits for absolute nonsense on Google. Mglovesfun (talk)
Here a few: the original coining, plus some independent uses. The single word form is hard to attest, but "God wink", in various forms of capitalisation/hyphenation is easier:
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2951: Parameter 1 is required.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2951: Parameter 1 is required.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2951: Parameter 1 is required.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2951: Parameter 1 is required.
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2951: Parameter 1 is required.
Smurrayinchester (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
It does seem that this spelling may not be citable. Until it is, we might have a redirect to a citable form, apparently God wink. The ambiguity of spelling is certainly suggestive that it is or is becoming idiomatic. The context in which its meaning is lexically understood rather than constructed from its parts may be quite limited. DCDuring TALK 14:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Godwink seems to be the spelling SQuire uses, but outside his books God wink prevails (apparently "godwink" is a trademark of SQuire's...). I dug up two more godwinks, so it's probably attestable (as long as one use by him is acceptable), but I don't know which should be the alternative form of which.
Lua error in Module:quote at line 2951: Parameter 1 is required.
Lua error in Module:quote at line 2951: Parameter 1 is required.
Smurrayinchester (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Here are two more citations:
A remarkable "coincidence"--a godwink--had reunited a long lost mother and daughter. What are the odds of that? [1]
THI$ I$ YOUR GODWINK [2] --BB12 (talk) 21:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
@BB12: The first groups citation is quoting Rushnell, isn't it?
@SMW: I'd make the more common one the main form. From the evidence the "trademarked" form is the source. DCDuring TALK 22:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
You are correct, thank you! --BB12 (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
@DCDuring I think he only came up with one word form some time around 2006 - possibly for copyright reasons. His earlier books use "God Wink". Pages created. Smurrayinchester (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
RFV-passed. - -sche (discuss) 04:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply