Talk:glowie

RFV discussion: September–October 2021

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

glowie

J3133 (talk) 09:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 03:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

RFD discussion: July–October 2022

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Undelete glowie

The current page content is vastly inferior to pre-deletion content. —Fish bowl (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

In addition: @Erutuon Can we find deleted pages that have been recreated like this? —Fish bowl (talk) 21:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

@Fish bowl: It depends on what exactly we'd want to look for. At the moment Quarry includes the archive table with username, wikitext length, and timestamp, but edit summaries and page contents of deleted pages redacted (which are available to administrators on-wiki). (This might be a mistake because normal users can't view these things on-wiki as far as I know.) so no way to check the quality of the deleted page, but we could find pages that have been deleted before. Maybe it could be done with the deletion log (logging table) too. — Eru·tuon 01:18, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Off the top of my head, something like the following might work:

use enwiktionary_p; select * from logging clog where clog.log_type="create" and clog.log_action="create" AND exists(select 1 from logging dlog where dlog.log_type="delete" and dlog.log_action="delete" and clog.log_namespace=dlog.log_namespace and clog.log_title=dlog.log_title) order by clog.log_timestamp desc limit 50;

98.170.164.88 02:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

This was deleted via RfV and recreated without citations, which is a no-no. (It's likely that it can be cited now that CFI allows for web sources, cf. FaCIAbook, but someone should actually cite it. The Atlantic quote on the Citations page is more of a mention.) 98.170.164.88 21:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Undelete. Trivially easy to cite now that internet sources are allowed. Binarystep (talk) 04:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Entry should exist. Equinox ◑ 10:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

I deleted the entry per our policies because, as 98.170.164.88 stated, it failed RFV and was recreated without citations. It will not be undeleted if no one provides citations. J3133 (talk) 13:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Pre-deletion contents. — SURJECTION ^{/ T / C / L /} 08:57, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

• Restored. - TheDaveRoss 14:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)