Talk:gentilitial
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Equinox
@J3133 What fun are you having over here? Adding a missing sense that's an alt form of a word we don't even have, and citations that might fit one of the other senses? That's quite unhelpful. Equinox ◑ 13:07, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Equinox: I added the citations separately instead of under the other senses because they are recent (as an alternative form of gentilicial, the most common form, which I have not created yet), as you have labelled them as obsolete (were they not, I would have added them to those senses)—where did you find out that they are obsolete and are they indeed? J3133 (talk) 13:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- @J3133: This entry was created from Webster 1913, so I probably copied their gloss (if it was considered obsolete in 1913, then it must be SUPER OLD now). Your citations are mostly foreign names so consider using the NNES template. Equinox ◑ 13:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Umm a definition wouldn't hurt either, seriously... Equinox ◑ 13:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Equinox: I have created gentilicial (someone needs to provide definitions) and added a note to gentilitial. J3133 (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- @J3133: Great, now we have two entries without a definition. But I can't fault your citing or formatting! jeez. Equinox ◑ 13:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)