Talk:for want of

RFD discussion: December 2017–January 2018

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

for want of

Isn't this just sum of parts? Kiwima (talk) 23:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

• Hmm. (deprecated template usage) want has more than one meaning, so I would tend to keep this. SemperBlotto (talk) 05:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

I suppose that the sense of want is, if not archaic, then dated. Other dictionaries have it. Keep. DCDuring (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Keep, see above. —Globins 04:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Keep. DonnanZ (talk) 11:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Kept. bd2412 T 23:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)