Talk:fauxlography
Latest comment: 2 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: March 2022
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
— SURJECTION / T / C / L / 12:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Speedily deleted: one of several apparently made-up entries created by a currently banned user. — SGconlaw (talk) 07:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- I found one cite (Citations:fauxlography); Google Scholar finds one use of "fauxlographic cloning" (whatever that means). - -sche (discuss) 22:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)