Talk:fauxcest

RFV discussion: June–August 2023

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

fauxcest

The two cites provided are both mentions. - TheDaveRoss 14:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

cited. I replaced the two cites you call mentions (although I am not sure I agree with you on that judgement) with other quotes from within the same articles that are clearly uses. In addition, I added three more cites, and there are plenty more out there. Kiwima (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

This is definitely a word we should have, but these cites (bar one) are not durably archived, so it would require a vote. This, that and the other (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

There's one book, and Aeon and The Daily Beast would seem to me to be the same genre as Vice and HuffPost—edited digital magazines/newspapers—rather than Twitter or random blogs, so generically acceptable sources if we're following the reasoning expressed at the 2022 straw poll. Given that, and that nobody has expressed any dissent in the last month or two, I'll tentatively call this RFV-passed. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 23:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)