Talk:exaampere
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by Gamren in topic RFV discussion: February–March 2017
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Recently changed from a no-entry by User:Gamren. DTLHS (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- My understanding is that this (and many more similar) are valid constructions that just haven't been used in the real-world yet (except in dictionaries and the like). I would keep them all, but with a note to that effect. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- This is RFV not RFD. And we already had that note with
{{no entry}}. DTLHS (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- I added this and other entries under the presumption that they would all be attestable. As I cannot seem to do so, I have no objection to reinstatement of the {no entry}.__Gamren (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- RFV failed. Page converted back to a no-entry. Translation table kept (disagree?).__Gamren (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- This is RFV not RFD. And we already had that note with