Talk:does one
This should probably be cleaned up and co-ordinated with the explanation of the auxiliary verb at do.
See Wiktionary:Requests for deletion for details. Eclecticology 08:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
The comment, even in May of 08, was: "Was RFCed a while ago, never cleaned. Formatting is crap." — Beobach 00:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Good now?—msh210℠ (talk) 22:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes! Thank you! :) — Beobach 23:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
SOP: does + one. Replace with {{only in|
.—msh210℠ (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
{{in appendix|English tag questions}}
}}
- Agreed, these belong a well-written grammatical appendix on question tags --Elemmemm 22:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Three old discussions are at [[Wiktionary:Tea room/2009/July#doesn't one]], [[Wiktionary:Tea room/2006#doesn't one?]], and [[Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Archives/2006/02#does one? and similar entries]], which latter was closed with, if anything, a consensus to delete (but mention at [[do]]).—msh210℠ (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Note that we can collect and keep translations of tag questions (and presumably any other pertinent information) at innit and, if we add the sense(!), at right. — Beobach 22:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Remove all skeletons from my closet. DAVilla 08:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- I like the appendix idea, not only for simplicity and neatness, but also because I think it's the most user-friendly solution. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry for not being clear. Sure, I wasn't opposed to that idea. DAVilla 17:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- I like the appendix idea, not only for simplicity and neatness, but also because I think it's the most user-friendly solution. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- The appendix already exists. See Appendix:English tag questions -- ALGRIF talk 20:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Appendicized.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)