Talk:deletionist

This is a very one-sided definition of the term. The other extreme would be an administrator that unecesserily removes valid information without respect for others opinions and knowledge. I suggest changing this term to make it more neutral or at least show the range in meaning. Jonty303 23:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

RFD

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

deletionist

As per CFI --Keene 08:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep all, as properly tagged. --Connel MacKenzie 08:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep as a generalized term, and remove the {{wjargon}} context if it can be verified. DAVilla 14:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep as per DAVilla. JackLumber 21:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Two meanings?

Are the two meanings actually separate? Isn't it only the context that changes, not the meaning of the word? Mglovesfun (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)