Talk:cuntbucket

RFV discussion: November 2011–February 2012

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

cuntbucket

We lack the full complement of attestations for this form, ie, citations of cunt bucket don't count as attestation. DCDuring TALK 12:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

They should.Lucifer 00:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

No they shouldn't, or I could create a new entry app le and ap-ple and say they existed because of apple, when they clearly don't exist! Equinox ◑ 00:12, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

See WT:COALMINE. DCDuring TALK 00:13, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Coalmine works only in one direction. It says that if a spelling with no space is attested, then it counts towards the version with a space. But it doesn't mean that anything that is attested with a space counts towards a form without it. —CodeCat 01:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Cited via Usenet. Equinox ◑ 12:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

What is Usenet and how does that count as a citation?Lucifer 23:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

They are on-line newsgroup e-mail postings that are deemed to be durably archived at multiple sites, in contrast to proprietary groups such as Yahoo and Google have. They are a subset of what is available at Google groups. It is a very good source for many types of current slang. DCDuring TALK 00:10, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Cool, how do you access it?Lucifer 01:44, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Try here. DCDuring TALK 02:36, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Passed. Thanks, Equinox! - -sche (discuss) 02:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)