Talk:cunt/whore
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Mr. Granger in topic RFV discussion: December 2015–March 2016
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Alt form of cuntwhore. I'm not sure that this kind of slashed construct is even a single "term" but I thought I'd go for RFV. Equinox ◑ 21:23, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ugh, delete. This one is speediable IMO. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not just offensive, it is also quite rare. I added two to the citations page, but that is all I could find. Kiwima (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- The cunt/whores one is quite nice (if you see what I mean) because it's the plural of a singular. The second one could be interpreted either as one word or the words cunt and whore linked by a slash. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed. I'd have thought this was SOP but for that.—msh210℠ (talk) 16:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- The cunt/whores one is quite nice (if you see what I mean) because it's the plural of a singular. The second one could be interpreted either as one word or the words cunt and whore linked by a slash. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not just offensive, it is also quite rare. I added two to the citations page, but that is all I could find. Kiwima (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 18:57, 10 March 2016 (UTC)