Talk:cumque

RFV discussion: February–March 2016

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

cumque

Latin adverb. RFV for the recently added sense "and when" (added five days ago). — I.S.M.E.T.A. 23:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

I have no doubt it's attestable, but it's just cum + -que, and since -que can be added to just about anything in Latin, the established practice here (confirmed about 3 years ago by the discussion at Talk:fasque#Deletion debate) is not to include such forms. And I see it's already been removed; so I hereby support the removal of this sense (but not the "however, whenever, etc." sense, which is legitimate). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Now it's been restored, so I say skip the RFV and delete per precedent. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

• Removed. This is not deemed acceptable content, both by the standards of the Latin editing community and by precedent, as Angr noted. Moreover, this is the wrong forum to have this discussion; there is no reason to fill RFV with RFD matters. If you want to continue it, do so there. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 22:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

  The other, inconventient precedent, is at Talk:satisne. So no, there is no consensus for this. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)